Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman told shareholders during the bank’s annual general meeting on May 26 that he does not plan to retire soon, and added that he puts the chances of a U.S. recession at less than 50%.
The bank’s shareholders also voted against a proposal to stop the bank lending to new fossil fuel projects.
When answering a shareholder question about whether he plans to retire “soon,” Gorman said no but added he also has no intention of dying on the job and that the bank continues to review its succession plan.
“I think healthy succession transitions for large, complex organizations and institutions are essential and that is a discussion I have with the board, at least on a yearly basis.”
Asked about the likelihood of a U.S. recession, Gorman said he believes it is still below 50%. “I’ve said publicly I thought it was probably around 30%, or maybe a little higher than that now,” he added.
As with other banks, Morgan Stanley’s board faced down a proposal, put forward by environment non-profit foundation Sierra Club, that it adopt a policy by year-end committing to proactive measures to cease financing new fossil fuel development.
A preliminary report of the voting showed only 8.3% of shareholders were in favor, in line with the board’s recommendation to vote no.
Morgan Stanley’s directors said in a document released in April that if the bank ceased funding fossil fuel projects, other players would still provide it.
“The transition to a low-carbon economy is complex, and requires intentional balancing of risks and opportunities,” they said, adding the bank is committed to reduce financing coal-fired power generation, thermal coal mining and new oil and gas projects in the Arctic.
“I think we’re frankly behaving very responsibly in helping this world and the world’s economies transition to cleaner sources of energy without enforcing abrupt changes that would be so disruptive and damaging in other areas,” Gorman said in the meeting, when responding to a question about funding liquefied natural gas projects.
Proposals to curb fossil fuel financing have received weak support for initiatives in other U.S. banks, such as JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo.
Sierra Club said in a statement its propositions lacked support of big asset managers. “As our climate crisis worsens, we need major asset managers to hold companies accountable to making the clean energy transition a reality,” it wrote.
Recommended Reading
Keeping it Tight: Diversified Energy Clamps Down on Methane Emissions
2024-04-24 - Diversified Energy wants to educate on emission reduction successes while debunking junk science.
MethaneSAT: EDF’s Eye in the Sky Targets E&P Emissions
2024-03-07 - The Environmental Defense Fund and Harvard University recently launched MethaneSAT, a satellite tracking methane emissions. The project’s primary target: oil and gas operators.
CAPP Forecasts $40.6B in Canadian Upstream Capex in 2024
2024-02-27 - The number is slightly over the estimated 2023 capex spend; CAPP cites uncertain emissions policy as a factor in investment decisions.
Majority of Recent CO2 Emissions Linked to 57 Producers - Report
2024-04-03 - The world's top three CO2-emitting companies in the period were state-owned oil firm Saudi Aramco, Russia's state-owned energy giant Gazprom and state-owned producer Coal India, the report said.
Qnergy Tackles Methane Venting Emissions
2024-03-13 - Pneumatic controllers, powered by natural gas, account for a large part of the oil and gas industry’s methane emissions. Compressed air can change that, experts say.