The Russia-led Nord Stream 2 consortium said on Aug. 10 it has applied to Denmark for an alternative gas pipeline route through the Baltic Sea that would avoid the Nordic state's territorial waters.
Denmark is facing a dilemma on whether the project can be built near its Baltic coast and its parliament may pass legislation allowing it to veto the Nord Stream 2 pipeline going through Danish territorial waters on security grounds.
Russia is keen to press ahead with the Nord Stream 2 pipeline since it has the potential to double its gas exports under the Baltic Sea to Germany, bypassing traditional routes through Ukraine with which it has poor relations.
The Danish government has come under fierce lobbying by Russia, EU allies and the U.S. over the $10.9 billion Nord Stream 2 project led by Gazprom and financed by five Western firms. The U.S. opposes the project while some eastern European countries fear it will make the EU a hostage to Russian gas
But Denmark does not want to act alone and has postponed a decision on the new legislation.
Its search for a united EU stance on the proposed pipeline is also deadlocked by divisions among member states over whether to do more business with Moscow despite its military incursions in Ukraine and Syria.
In July, President Donald Trump accused Germany of being a “captive” of Russia due to its energy reliance and said it was wrong to support the Baltic gas pipeline.
A Danish veto, under new legislation allowing it to do so on security grounds, would force Russia, which supplies about one third of Europe's gas needs, to find a new route for the pipeline.
“The recommendation of [Denmark’s] ministry of foreign affairs has been pending since January 2018. Therefore, Nord Stream 2 decided to explore alternative routes outside of Danish territorial waters,” the Nord Stream 2 consortium said in a statement.
The new application process will take about 12 months to complete, a spokesman for the Danish Energy Agency said.
A Nord Stream 2 spokesman said the project is progressing as planned in other countries and that it expects “no significant delay” to the pipeline.
The Danish part of the pipeline will be installed in the second half of 2019, he said. The alternative route would be 175 km long and pass north-west of the island of Bornholm.
The consortium said it was not withdrawing an application filed in April last year to build a parallel pipeline to the existing Nord Stream pipeline that is already shipping Russian natural gas to Germany.
Sweden, Finland and Germany all earlier this year issued permits for the pipeline to run through their exclusive economic zone, which is regulated by U.N. law.
Recommended Reading
White House Open to Ending LNG Export Pause in Push for Ukraine Aid, Sources Say
2024-04-02 - Reversing the pause could be tolerable to the White House in order to advance Ukraine aid, in part because the pause has no bearing on near-term LNG exports, the White House sources said.
US Expected to Supply 30% of LNG Demand by 2030
2024-02-23 - Shell expects the U.S. to meet around 30% of total global LNG demand by 2030, although reliance on four key basins could create midstream constraints, the energy giant revealed in its “Shell LNG Outlook 2024.”
CERAWeek: JERA CEO Touts Importance of US LNG Supply
2024-03-22 - JERA Co. Global CEO Yukio Kani said during CERAWeek by S&P Global that it was important to have a portfolio of diversified LNG supply sources, especially from the U.S.
Silver Linings in Biden’s LNG Policy
2024-03-12 - In the near term, the pause on new non-FTA approvals could lift some pressure of an already strained supply chain, lower both equipment and labor expenses and ease some cost inflation.
Dispatch from the LNG Front: Development Not ‘Paused’ so much as Slowed
2024-04-04 - Analysts: Low prices may stall upcoming gas gathering projects that are needed for an expected boom.