Australia's Woodside Energy and Santos said on Feb. 7 they had ended merger talks to create a possible $52 billion global oil and gas giant, and Santos flagged it would look for other ways to bolster its value.
Woodside, which is more than twice as large as Santos by revenue and market capitalization, said it would only pursue a deal that would clearly benefit its shareholders.
Santos shares fell nearly 9% after the announcement and closed down 5.8% while Woodside's stock ended up 0.5%.
The talks, first announced in December, fell apart as the two companies could not agree on a valuation level, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter who could not be named discussing confidential information.
A firm bid did not emerge from Woodside following the almost two months of due diligence and negotiations that the parties undertook, one of the sources said.
Woodside declined to comment on those points and Santos did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Santos said in a statement that after "an initial exchange of information, sufficient combination benefits were not identified to support a merger that would be in the best interests of Santos shareholders".
If the merger had taken place, it would have created a major global LNG producer that could attract more offshore investors as gas is seen as a key bridging fuel in the shift to cleaner energy.
"While the discussions with Santos did not result in a transaction, Woodside considers that the global LNG sector provides significant potential for value creation," Woodside CEO Meg O’Neill said in a statement.
Woodside had faced pressure from some investors not to pay a premium for Santos in what would have been one of the largest corporate takeovers in Australian history.
"Woodside's decision to walk away is a relief," said Simon Mawhinney, chief investment officer at Allan Gray, which holds about $456 million worth of Woodside stock. The fund last week wrote to management warning against pursuing a deal.
"We had hoped this would be the outcome," Mawhinney said. "It was unclear to us where there was much merit in a tie up."
For Woodside, this is the second time in just over eight years that it has ditched a deal that would have given it gas assets in Papua New Guinea, prized for their low production costs and proximity to big LNG buyers in north Asia.
Recommended Reading
Exxon Shale Exec Details Plans for Pioneer’s Acreage, 4-mile Laterals
2024-05-03 - Exxon Mobil plans to drill longer, more capital efficient wells in the Midland Basin after a major boost from the $60 billion Pioneer Natural Resources acquisition. Data shows that Exxon is a leading operator drilling 4-mile laterals in the Permian’s Delaware Basin.
Exxon Closes $60B Pioneer Deal, Reshaping Permian Basin
2024-05-03 - After facing regulatory scrutiny, Exxon Mobil closed a roughly $60 billion acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources. The largest shale oil transaction ever signed will reshape the order of power in the vast Permian Basin oil field.
ONEOK CEO: ‘Huge Competitive Advantage’ to Upping Permian NGL Capacity
2024-03-27 - ONEOK is getting deeper into refined products and adding new crude pipelines through an $18.8 billion acquisition of Magellan Midstream. But the Tulsa company aims to capitalize on NGL output growth with expansion projects in the Permian and Rockies.
Analysts: Diamondback-Endeavor Deal Creates New Permian Super Independent
2024-02-12 - The tie-up between Diamondback Energy and Endeavor Energy—two of the Permian’s top oil producers—is expected to create a new “super-independent” E&P with a market value north of $50 billion.
Is Double Eagle IV the Most Coveted PE-backed Permian E&P Left?
2024-04-22 - Double Eagle IV is quietly adding leases and drilling new oil wells in core parts of the Midland Basin. After a historic run of corporate consolidation, is it the most attractive private equity-backed E&P still standing in the Permian Basin?