The Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion’s tortuous construction process has hit another snag, and the company said it was considering options to keep the project in line with its latest deadline.
On Jan. 29, Trans Mountain, the government-owned Canadian company responsible for the pipeline’s construction, issued a statement saying that “during the pipeline pullback activity,” a section requiring a horizontal directional drill “encountered technical issues, which will result in additional time to determine the safest and most prudent actions for minimizing further delay.”
Trans Mountain is still estimating, for now, an in-service date by the end of the second quarter, potentially pushed back from an anticipated April startup.
The Trans Mountain Pipeline is Canada’s sole westbound, crude-carrying line. The CA$30.9 billion (US$23.035 billion) expansion project is 97% complete, and is expected to triple shipments from Alberta to the Pacific Coast at a rate of 890,000 bbl/d.
In 2013, the original cost of the project was slated at CA$5.4 billion (US$4.025 billion) and was to be built by Kinder Morgan, which sold the project to the Canadian government in 2018. Company officials have blamed price increases on labor shortages, supply-chain issues and unexpected difficulties encountered in building through the more rugged areas of British Colombia.
The latest issues arose at the end of last week, Jan. 25 to Jan. 27. The company’s announcement of the delay was two paragraphs long.
Besides informing the public about the technical delay, the statement said Trans Mountain “is fully focused on the completion of the pipeline and will not be providing interviews at this time” as workers continue towards an in-service date in the second quarter of 2024.
On Jan. 24, just before the technical problems were encountered, a company leader speaking at the Argus Crude Summit in Houston gave a start-up date of early April, Reuters reported.
Less than two weeks before, the company cleared a major hurdle towards completion, when the Canada Energy Regulator ruled Jan. 12 in favor of a pipeline variance the Trans Mountain had requested. The variance, which allowed the company to shrink the size of a 1.4-mile segment in British Columbia, was needed to avoid a delay that could have lasted two years, according to Trans Mountain executives.
Recommended Reading
High Interest Rates a Headwind for the Energy Transition
2024-04-18 - Persistent high interest rates will make transitioning to a net zero global economy much harder and more costly, according to Wood Mackenzie Head of Economics Peter Martin.
Clean Energy Begins Operations at South Dakota RNG Facility
2024-04-23 - Clean Energy Fuels’ $26 million South Dakota RNG facility will supply fuel to commercial users such as UPS and Amazon.
BCCK, Vision RNG Enter Clean Energy Partnership
2024-04-23 - BCCK will deliver two of its NiTech Single Tower Nitrogen Rejection Units (NRU) and amine systems to Vision RNG’s landfill gas processing sites in Seneca and Perry counties, Ohio.
Bunge, Chevron Announce FID on Oilseed Processing Plant
2024-03-05 - Bunge Chevron Ag Renewables' facility will be used to manufacture low carbon renewable fuels from oilseed.
Trace Carbon Solutions Applies for First Phase of Class VI Wells at Evergreen Hub
2024-03-12 - Trace is applying for its subsidiary Evergreen Sequestration Hub to be allowed to permanently sequester CO2 in underground geological formations in Louisiana.