Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said U.S. delays in approving the Keystone XL pipeline are “not a hopeful sign” and reflect the “peculiar politics” of the Obama administration.
“A positive decision has not been rendered for a very long time, that’s obviously not a hopeful sign,” Harper said in an interview June 29 at his Ottawa office, adding he discussed the matter recently with the U.S. president. “I think there’s very peculiar politics of this particular administration.”
U.S. President Barack Obama will reject the project in August, Republican Senator John Hoeven said June 28, citing unidentified “sources.” TransCanada Corp.’s proposed $8 billion link between Alberta crude deposits and Gulf Coast refineries has been under review since 2008.
Harper said a rejection of the pipeline “is clearly possible,” when asked about Hoeven’s comments.
The White House refused to comment on the status of the Keystone review, with spokesman Eric Schultz saying the matter was being handled at the State Department.
Schultz said he hadn’t read or heard Hoeven’s statement and knew nothing about what he based the assertion on. “I’m not sure I would classify him as a confidante of the State Department.”
‘No-Brainer’
Getting the project approved has been among Harper’s highest-priority diplomatic efforts. He called the project a “no-brainer” in a 2011 interview.
A rejection of the project in the next few months could be a setback for Harper heading into Oct. 19 elections. His government’s position has consistently been that Keystone offers job creation and the displacement of oil imports from countries that can be hostile to the U.S.
Keystone has become one of the most controversial energy issues of Obama’s presidency. He has questioned its benefits to the U.S. and vetoed a Republican-backed bill that would have bypassed a State Department review and allowed construction.
“The fact a decision has not been rendered for so long, even after all the objective analyses said that the project is better from an economic standpoint, an energy standpoint, even an environmental standpoint -- it’s certainly preferable to rail -- even after all those things, a decision hasn’t been rendered,” Harper said. “I believe that whether this project goes ahead or not under this administration, it will ultimately go ahead under a subsequent administration.”
Recommended Reading
Guyana’s Stabroek Boosts Production as Chevron Watches, Waits
2024-04-25 - Chevron Corp.’s planned $53 billion acquisition of Hess Corp. could potentially close in 2025, but in the meantime, the California-based energy giant is in a “read only” mode as an Exxon Mobil-led consortium boosts Guyana production.
US Interior Department Releases Offshore Wind Lease Schedule
2024-04-24 - The U.S. Interior Department’s schedule includes up to a dozen lease sales through 2028 for offshore wind, compared to three for oil and gas lease sales through 2029.
Utah’s Ute Tribe Demands FTC Allow XCL-Altamont Deal
2024-04-24 - More than 90% of the Utah Ute tribe’s income is from energy development on its 4.5-million-acre reservation and the tribe says XCL Resources’ bid to buy Altamont Energy shouldn’t be blocked.
Mexico Presidential Hopeful Sheinbaum Emphasizes Energy Sovereignty
2024-04-24 - Claudia Sheinbaum, vying to becoming Mexico’s next president this summer, says she isn’t in favor of an absolute privatization of the energy sector but she isn’t against private investments either.
Venture Global Gets FERC Nod to Process Gas for LNG
2024-04-23 - Venture Global’s massive export terminal will change natural gas flows across the Gulf of Mexico but its Plaquemines LNG export terminal may still be years away from delivering LNG to long-term customers.